The purpose of federal hate crimes is to take total control of all criminal courts in all the states of the United States. Hate crime laws are no different from having a law prohibiting disrespect for the law. Thus if one is acquitted of a crime one can still be tried for disrespect as evidenced by that same act.

Hate crime laws permit people to be tried twice for the same act by simply changing the name of the crime. This undermines the traditional protection of the Anglo-Saxon legal system from the government of endless trials for the same crime. There are other such laws including deprivation of civil rights which for the first time individuals rather than governments can commit.

The Government now has at least three tries to get the same conviction. And of course the individual stays in jail all the years waiting for those trials and is most certainly bankrupted. Even if the government should lose all the trials it has exacted years in prison, brought financial ruin upon the persecuted and made them essentially unemployable for the rest of their life.

And the federal courts mandate juries read the minds of the accused, something otherwise limited to stage shows, charlatans and SciFi movies. Now federal government has joined that august group. While the law and reasonable prosecution requires the rules of evidence to be followed as to demonstrated motivation it is possible to wash their hands of the imperial federal courts which have directed juries to read minds.

This was most openly done in the trial of the officers in the Rodney King case. Once it is done it is case law precedent regardless of what is written in law. Of course the superstitious who believe it is possible to read minds believe justice was done. The world is full of idiots and there is no protection from them.

As if that were not enough, hate crime prosecutions at all levels are not a matter of justice as are prosecutions for real crimes. They are in all cases without exception politically motivated on the grounds of race. That is well known and even the mention of that fact is considered racist. The truth can not be racist.

In the following I have to make a distinction between Whites as Caucasians which includes Hispanics and Jews and traditional Whites which includes now all European descent including Italian and Portuguese but excluding Spanish. However Portuguese are Hispanic if in the US via Brazil. Confusing? Lets go on and see if the discussion makes it clear.

When there is a crime against a Black, Whites include traditional Whites, Hispanics and Jews. When there is a crime against a Jew, Whites include traditional Whites and Hispanics. When there is a crime against a Hispanic, Whites include traditional Whites and Jews.

Also if there is a hate crime against a less traditional group in the US such from Asia including India and of course any American Indian who are otherwise considered more American than American, Whites include traditional Whites, Jews and Hispanics.

There can not a hate crimes against traditional Whites by anyone so the other groups do not count. Neither a Hispanic, Jew or Black, nor Amerind, Asian Indian, Chinese, Japanese, etc can can commit a hate crime against any group in any manner even if they loudly assert hatred is their reason.

I see a pattern there and if you do also you see why I had to make the distinction among Whites. Those who see no problem with the pattern are prejudiced bigots usually of the liberal persuasion.

One of the excuses to break Jews out for separate consideration is that the crime may be upon the grounds of religion. As it is known over half of those in the US claiming to be Jews are in name only as they are atheists any failure to consider that difference is in fact a form of mind reading. And as noted they are also Caucasian Whites so it can not be race.

There are things that are ordinarily considered negatives such as prejudice and bigotry. If you see nothing wrong with the above assumptions regarding traditional Whites then you are a bigot. In fact being a liberal, rather than an absolution from being a prejudiced bigot is in fact a confirmation of being a prejudiced bigot.

If in fact the purpose of these laws as a matter of justice they would not be politically applied. If the purpose were justice there would be no necessity to define the traditional White as separate from White depending upon who is credited with the crime. Equality before the law, another Anglo-Saxon tradition is no more.

Even with the belief, however childlike, that such laws are in a good cause, once they exist all of the consequences of the laws are applicable to other laws. The case law requirement to read minds is not limited to just hate crimes. Who can and can not commit a crime is not limited to just hate crimes. Who is and is not prosecuted is not limited to just hate crimes.

Future laws on completely unrelated subjects benefit from all of these no longer extant limitations. Environmental laws such as the endangered species laws have the specific intention of giving the government total control over the behavior of individuals.

That may sound absurd and of course the government will deny it but remember The Sixth Truth of The Ten Truths of Government Tyranny. Everything the Government says will never happen will happen.

One might ask why a government would want total control. If the political movements of this century have taught us anything it is that politicians want nothing else. It is the same motivation of royalty, living off of others beats working for a living.

With the way opened for more such laws, in addition to the new clintonian tradition that the ruling party is above all laws, the purpose of these laws are obvious. They are a more civilized form of terror than was instituted by communism.